In Part I and Part II of this post we looked into the problem of finding a suitable discrete-time controller when the system being controlled is fast to reach steady-state so that it can be modeled as the single delay
$$y(t) = G u(t – \tau), \quad \tau > 0.$$
In Part I we showed that a proportional controller is not a good choice and in Part II we found out that, surprisingly, an integral only controller is an excellent choice but requires the use of a gain $\hat{G}$ that has to match the gain of the system $G$. In the present post we will revisit the design of a dynamic controller with the goal of showing that:
- the Smith predictor from Part II also had a zero;
- the integral controller is indeed an excellent choice;
- the mismatch $\hat{G} \neq G$ is not necessarily catastrophic.